Should tobacco companies be held responsible for smoking

should tobacco companies be held responsible for smoking Tobacco companies, not the smoker, should be held responsible if smoking results in disease and death nicotine is a highly addictive substance, and quitting a struggle for most smokers this frame applies when the article is focused on the smoker, not the industry.

Tobacco companies: responsibility for smoking-related illnesses and deaths the debate of whether tobacco companies should be held responsible for diseases that are related to smoking has been there for some time now. No, that is like saying the alcohol producing companies should be held responsible for every drunk driving accident the tabacco companies make the product, but the consumer makes his/her own conscious decision to use them or not. The only reason tobacco companies should and are being held responsible for smoking related illnesses and deaths is because the tobacco company executives lied to congress when they all stated before a congressional hearing that tobacco smoking was not addictive.

Should tobacco companies be held responsible by matthew8810 depends i believe anyone who began smoking before the risks of smoking were known and before the addictive properties were known should be able to sue the tobacco companies. Should tobacco companies be held responsible for tobacco related illnesses or deaths answer questions recently dx’d with bit d deficiency and being tested for lupus. The tobacco companies have misled the public regarding the harmful effects of the toxic chemicals in their products and their addictive nature therefore, they should be held legally responsible for all the illnesses and deaths associated with smoking.

Should smokers be allowed to sue tobacco companies for smoking-related illnesses to sue tobacco companies when they get a smoking-related illness . Should tobacco companies be held responsible for smoking-related illnesses and deaths - assignment example on in assignment sample tobacco companies count in the list of among the most successful conglomerates all over the globe in their businesses of selling tobacco products. This essay will discuss about why the tobacco companies should be held responsible for smoking related illness or death the juvenile smoking act 1919 (bengal act ii of 1919 this is an act for the prevention of smoking by juveniles. Should tobacco companies be held responsible and liable for costs associated with lung cancer and other smoking-related illnesses (2005, september 05).

Start studying tobacco companies shouldn't be held responsible learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. In the end the companies should not be held responsible and it is the consumers choice to use the product the companies are selling to the public. Should tobacco companies be held responsible for smoking-related deathsmission: this paper will require you choosing a topic, doing research, formulating a thesis, and writing a. Since tobacco companies influence individuals to pleasant into an addictive practice , the companies also ought to be held responsible for shun consequences thence and not to solely break up the tobacco dor . Should tobacco companies be responsible for smoking related illnesses tobacco companies should not be held liable for the consequences of smoking related illness or death because as people we have a choice whether or not to smoke.

I think smoking companies should be responsible for smoking related deaths if something was wrong with the smokes eg food poisoning dangerous chemicals or different ingredients then the . Should tobacco companies be held responsible for smoking-related deaths all papers must be typed, double spaced, left aligned, using a 12pt times new roman font. Tobacco companies however should not be solely held responsible for smoking related illnesses and deaths it is inappropriate to shelf the blame of smoking related illnesses to tobacco companies while it is well known that it is individuals who make the choice to smoke. Tobacco companies make it known that their product causes smoke related illnesses and death therefore they should not be held responsible -actually, they try their hardest to get around that law . Best answer: no, people have the choice to either smoke or not to smoke, they know the consequences so why should the companies be held accountable think of it .

Should tobacco companies be held responsible for smoking

should tobacco companies be held responsible for smoking Tobacco companies, not the smoker, should be held responsible if smoking results in disease and death nicotine is a highly addictive substance, and quitting a struggle for most smokers this frame applies when the article is focused on the smoker, not the industry.

Should tobacco companies be held responsible for smoking-related deaths mission: this paper will require you choosing a topic, doing research, formulating a thesis, and writing a formal essay you will be composing more than one draft, while using documented research, or quotes. Should tobacco companies be held responsible for smoking related illness and deaths the uncovering of tobacco can be traced back to the voyage of. View should tobacco companies be held responsible for smoking from eng eng-101-ol at thomas edison state college should tobacco companies be held responsible for smoking-related illnesses and.

  • In a 1989 gallup poll, only 16% of americans said tobacco companies should be held responsible for smokers' health problems, while 79% said they should not more than a decade later, gallup found relatively little change in this sentiment.
  • Should tobacco companies be held responsible for smoking-related illnesses and deaths i introduction a should tobacco companies be held responsible for smoking related illnesses.

Tobacco companies aren't held responsible for this, unless they sold tobacco during those years now that warning on the package will let any new company off for free smells like new screen names 7 years ago. Should the beer, wine and other alcohol companies be held liable for dwi's, injuries related to etoh abuse, etoh related sicknesses and diseases, and more importantly deaths caused by alcohol no one holds them responsible for the bad things that happen from their products. Should tobacco companies be held responsible for smoking related diseases discuss should tobacco companies be held responsible for smoking related diseases within the hot debates - the big fight forums, part of the management students voices ( mba,bms,mms,bmm,bba) category tobacco alone sells itself due to the fact that it is very tranquil to someone who is usually stressed out . Should tobacco companies be held responsible should tobacco companies be held responsible for the deaths and health issues caused by its products health risks and deaths due to product use.

should tobacco companies be held responsible for smoking Tobacco companies, not the smoker, should be held responsible if smoking results in disease and death nicotine is a highly addictive substance, and quitting a struggle for most smokers this frame applies when the article is focused on the smoker, not the industry. should tobacco companies be held responsible for smoking Tobacco companies, not the smoker, should be held responsible if smoking results in disease and death nicotine is a highly addictive substance, and quitting a struggle for most smokers this frame applies when the article is focused on the smoker, not the industry.
Should tobacco companies be held responsible for smoking
Rated 4/5 based on 33 review
Download